Rare, Collectible, & Otherwise

Tag: books (Page 110 of 128)

Ray J.

World War II had ended and Ray J. was back from the Pacific and helping out his dad behind the bar of the Palace News in Parsons, Kansas. It was a little-bit-of-this and a little-bit-of-that sort of place, with newspapers, magazines, cee-gars, sandwiches, and a frosty mug ‘o suds.

Ray J. was known as Bud, since his dad was Ray J. the elder. It would have made me Ray J. III, but I suppose that was just too confusing. I imagine he was little Buddy first, then shortened to Bud later. Some of the cousins called him Uncle Bud, and I was okay with that, although I only heard him called by that name when we visited Parsons for the holidays.

There were a couple of stories that I recall about the place. In a letter addressed to the VA hospital where Bud was recovering from injuries suffered in a car accident, his dad wrote how he had brought out the guitar when Ray J.’s young friends had come round. They sang all the old songs, he wrote. It had never been mentioned to me that my grandfather played guitar, so the letter was a revelation.

There were no musical instruments in our house growing up, save the radio/record player. Ray J. loved to sing, but didn’t do it so much when we kids were older. He was a fine tenor and told me once how he and his buddies used to sing the Irish songs. Shame on me for not learning to play them along with all those Beatles songs. It might have endeared me a little more to him, given that he was no fan of current hits, which he called “thumpa-thumpa” music. He was listening to a Musak channel on television once when I walked through the room. It was a symphonic version of the Beatles’ – Michelle.

Me: You like that song?

Ray J., nodding: Sure do.

Me: That’s a Beatles song, you know.

Ray J., without a second’s hesitation: Too bad they don’t play it like that.

He was known to bring pals back to the house years later, after a long St. Patrick’s Day evening at the Elk’s Lodge. Some singing went on then. It was never discussed much the next day, as I recall.

Ray Senior was a marketing genius, to hear his son tell it. A traveling salesman managed to unload a case of Kleenex Travelers, those little packages of tissues, which made for a prominent display up near the bar. Ten for a Dollar, he priced them. Or ten cents each. The case emptied pretty fast, selling ten at a time.

Then there were the hard boiled eggs. A big, big jar with pearly white eggs bobbing around in some sort of brine. They were to be dipped in salt, according to the custom. A plate full of salt and a free egg – where can you go wrong there? Took a lot of beer to wash down those eggs and salt. The beer wasn’t free.

This picture is one of several found among the shelves at the shop. A shot of the Palace interior is often assumed to be the book store in the old days, long and narrow with a pressed tin ceiling. You can click on it for a closer look at the old cash register and wooden cabinets. Wish I had them in the shop now…

I regret that I don’t have a picture of me wiping down the counter at Paddy’s, back in my bar-backing days. It could have been added to this one and the one with Ray Senior smoking his cee-gar behind the taps at the Palace. Three generations of bar-cleaning, beer-pulling, descendants of Mamie Gillen of County Tipperary.

Boxers, in brief.

Some of them are just typos, no doubt someone creating a Craigslist ad on their small-button smart-phone. Others… I’m not sure exactly what to think.

I like to look over the listings just in case there is someone offering something of tremendous value for very little money. It hasn’t happened yet, but I have found a couple of items that I wound up owning.

Not going for Chester Drawers though. I should have clicked on the link to read the description, but it was more fun to simply wonder if some fellow named Chester was selling off his underwear or – instead – it was a couple of drawers full of chesters. You can never keep enough chesters around the house.

There is a slim possibility that the seller meant to offer a “chest of drawers,” which Chester might have kept his underwear in.

Sunday evening’s listings featured another classic, but when I went back to review it this morning it had disappeared. Hopefully a quick sale ended the need for the ad. I’m fairly certain there are no Craigslist editors out there.

Words and Workers

As someone who sells words by the book-full, I admire those who use them well. Newspaper headline writers have long been known for their witty and eye-catching phrases in big bold ink, designed to grab attention through concise wording.

This morning I spotted this one: Did Ding Dongs kill the Twinkie?

The headline is in reference to the announcement by Hostess that it would shut down operations and liquidate the company, in the face of a continuing baker’s union labor strike. If you’ve ever driven through the intersection of 11th and Sheridan in Tulsa, no doubt you’ve caught the aroma of fresh bread baking. If you’ve passed by recently, you will have spotted the striking workers holding out in a contract dispute with management.

I may be the ultimate flip-flopper on labor issues. It is one thing to look back on historical abuses by companies in dealing with their employees, and applaud the collective bargaining agreements obtained by unions. Honestly, though – the days of the American sweatshop filled with child-laborers are gone. There are exceptions, including a couple of local cases, but times have changed regarding the manufacturing world. Where my allegiance would have been to the early-day strikers in the past, these days I find myself wondering about the practical outcome of some labor decisions.

From the outside looking in, it would appear than many of today’s labor disputes are more about feathering nests than resolving dangerous practices in the work environment.

So – when the headline mentions Ding Dongs and Twinkies in the same sentence, one is a reference to the iconic twin cakes and the other slyly infers that a group that turns down an eight percent pay cut in favor of a one-hundred percent cut must not be thinking clearly.

Certainly, the baking giant’s demise (if it comes about) can’t be blamed entirely on one labor strike. The firm had only recently come out of bankruptcy reorganization. Somebody up in a cozy office is making mistakes too. On the other hand, if the operation is shut down because labor and management cannot agree on a contract, everyone loses.

I remembered a similar situation in southern Oklahoma years ago, when a lingering strike against a national manufacturer’s local plant ended with the closure of the facility and the transfer of the operations to a plant in another city. Common sense seemed to have taken a back seat then, much like it appears to have done in the Hostess strike. A Tulsa worker was quoted as shouting “Shut it down then!” when the 4pm deadline was reached on Thursday afternoon.

Apparently, they will.

Who will those workers picket when the ovens grow cold at 11th and Sheridan?

Likely, pride enters into the thinking process at some point. Holding out for the principle of the thing.

It may be that another company will acquire the Tulsa bakery and hire the workers as employees, but there is no assurance their job offers will be any greater than the contract offered by Hostess before liquidation.

Time will provide an answer to this morning’s headline about Ding Dongs and Twinkies, but in the meantime, I’m reminded of the French saying misattributed to Marie Antoinette:

“Qu’ils mangent de la brioche…”

Let them eat cake.

« Older posts Newer posts »