Rare, Collectible, & Otherwise

Category: Uncategorized (Page 10 of 45)

Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a darn, cad-dash-it.

It was 75 years ago this month that those immortal words (or a similar phrase) were uttered by Rhett Butler in Margaret Mitchell’s lengthy antebellum romance, Gone with the Wind. Given that the book is set in the Deep South, her title is pretty close to the mark.

They are still working just to get started with the cleanup from the wind damage from the tornado-packing thunderstorms that raked the southern US. Tara, Scarlett O’Hara’s plantation home will have survived, along with Mitchell’s book title, which has become one of the post-twister phrases painted on rubble where homes used to be located.

For the 60th anniversary of the book’s release, publishers whipped up a fancy hardback edition as a commemorative item. Now, on the 75th year after the debut, stores can offer a paperback printed for the occasion – or that commemorative digital download with special gold-flecked text that glimmers in direct sunlight.

I’m kidding about that part.

It is obvious that the big sellers care more about the new electronic books than the standard, don’t-ever-need-a-battery type. With the exception of James Patterson, a suspense novelist who cranks out a new title every forty minutes, there are no television ads for published works. Even the Kindle and Nook don’t advertise titles, just devices.

Barnes and Noble never had a commercial before. Now, they’re talking about how the book lives on, or some other marketing phrase. Ironically, the ads will eventually contribute to the death of the book as we know it.

It’s a matter of time before the paper and ink items will become as curious and collectible as 45rpm vinyl records or as obscure as eight-track music tape cartridges (already most of you don’t recall those…).

I’m asked my opinion about whether the Kindle and the Nook will catch on, and – saluting Margaret Mitchell on the anniversary of her life’s work – I reply, “Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a…”

Perspectives on the Killing.

It isn’t just a matter of personal impact – the announcement that terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden has been killed brought all sorts of reactions from Americans, from relatives of 9-11 victims to elected officials.

“Everyone knew someone who died on 9-11,” said one New Yorker, “or knew someone who knew someone who died.”

I have to admit, I don’t. Probably, I’m not the only one in the US either. It was a reaction from the New York perspective. All Americans were outraged by the terrorist attack, the degree of outrage is influenced by the perspective.

Even the newspapers had varying points of view. “We Got Him!” declared the Tulsa World, while the national daily USA Today laid the claim squarely with the president, tagging the death-headline with “says Obama.”

Time also affects reactions.

It has been nearly a decade since the bin Laden assault on US soil. Some of the young men and women seen cheering in front of the White House had to have been in elementary school when the twin towers went down.

News anchors Sunday night – to a man – repeated how life in the US had changed ‘forever’ as a result of the events of September 11th, but younger citizens have grown up in that environment and know nothing else. It’s like trying to imagine a time before television: a novel thought for a moment or two, and then the thought goes away.

Some things are different as a result of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda. I used to enjoy taking a trip by airline. There was always a certain excitement, almost like riding an amusement park roller coaster. For me, it has been replaced by an emotion nearing dread – not for my personal safety, but because of the cattle-in-the-corral shuffling toward a demeaning and embarrassing inspection process. I’m always singled out to remove shoes and clothing for a pat-down.

I understand the reasons. I just don’t like them. The death of Osama bin Laden gives me no personal closure, and while it is satisfying to have him out of the terrorist equation, it is disappointing that it took the most powerful nation on earth a decade to accomplish the task. It is a little like Jean Val Jean in Les Miserables and the relentless tracking of his pursuer – except Victor Hugo’s criminal only stole a loaf of bread. When the final confrontation finally occurs, it is almost anti-climactic.

Stories will continue to come out of it. How did Pakistan know nothing about the world’s number one terror-mastermind living in a military-entrenched city, far from the Afghanistan border? What actually happened during the assault? Who was involved?

What will change?

Very little, I imagine. Those involved in bin Laden’s network will want their revenge.

Attacks will continue against western countries whose citizens wonder whether – at the time of his death – Osama bin Laden was welcomed into the hereafter as a martyr for the cause, or as the Christian theology would have it: condemned to Hell for eternity.

Cee Lo, Christina, Blake & Adam: The Voice Arrives on NBC

I admit to being a fan of music all of my life. Among my first spoken words as a toddler was a blurted “Como!” when I recognized Perry Como crooning on the car radio. That’s not why I watched NBC’s The Voice.

The fact is, I didn’t watch it all. I was having my way with the remote control infrared channel selection device (years ago my son disputed my calling it – the button – as in “Hand me the button, would’ya?”).

The button landed on the Voice, and there you go.

It struck me as a novel approach, having the panel making their determination without being influenced by how handsome or shapely the singer. American Idol admits they are looking for the package deal, but even Susan the Squat Scot sold enough CDs to make any Idol contestant envious.

Cee Lo came from 90s hip hop Goodie Mob through Gnarls Barkely to land on The Voice. Christina came out of a fumbled national anthem. Adam Levine has his Maroon 5 background and music industry experience. Blake Shelton is hot on the country music circuit. Assembled, they make up the judging panel.

As for the voices – for some reason I expected the worst. As it turned out, most weren’t belt-it-out-in-the-shower, but-keep-the-curtain-drawn-types. There has always been diversity in the music industry anyway. There was a powerfully-done rendition of Janis Joplin’s “Piece of my Heart,” and a soulful take on Cyndi Lauper’s “Time after Time,” was credible done by Javier Colon – the best of the evening, in my estimation.

The thing is, landing on the program late, I didn’t catch the rules. When the judges began making pleas to the singers to “choose me!” I had to scratch my head. Team this, and team that. There is probably a plan in there somewhere. It’s obviously more than just the Voice.

Maybe you can ‘splain it to me.

« Older posts Newer posts »