Rare, Collectible, & Otherwise

Author: admin (Page 163 of 220)

Acceptance letters from publishers: still fun

Maybe all those years of getting rejections still haven’t worn off, but there is no denying it still brings a thrill to have a publisher – even if it is an internet publisher – accept something I’ve written.

I still have the first acceptance letter I ever received, back when those sorts of things arrived from the postman on paper that came from actual trees – nothing digital, nothing recycled, nothing but the old typewriter.

Typewriter (tīp’rī’tər) n. A writing machine that produces characters similar to typeset print by means of a manually operated keyboard that actuates a set of raised types, which strike the paper through an inked ribbon.

That first letter was for a piece of short fiction I wrote – the magazine editor mentioned he thought it sounded a little Ray Bradbury-esque. That was high praise, for me. Included with the acceptance letter was a small check. I mean, small.

I ran across something that Yahoo! offers called Associated Content that supposedly pays for stories, and sent in an article. Today, I got a note – email – that it had been accepted. No check, as yet, but I learned years ago that you cannot set out to be a writer for money.

People write because they are driven to do it – more like a curse, really. It is something that usually has to be done alone, and little comes from most of it.

Except, occasionally, there is an acceptance letter.

It’s still fun to have a stranger publish your writing.

Makes for a happy day.

Remembering the Race: Kentucky Derby Daze.

I remember how proud I was my first Kentucky Derby, my son dressed in his finery, on the back of the horse in front of so many people, the crowd abuzz in anticipation of the start of the ‘Run for the Roses.’

Of course, we were nowhere near the racetrack.

My boss, Lee Masters, Tulsa radio station K95FM’s manager – who later went on to even greater fame and fortune with MTV and the E! television network – was staging a Derby watch-party at his grand home near Utica Square in Tulsa. His wife hailed from Louisville, and as a result, the Kentucky Derby was celebrated with all the passion of St. Patrick’s Day in New York City.

He had hired a fellow to bring along a small-sized horse for pony rides. I thought it made for a wonderful surprise.

Having grown up with neighbors who owned horses, I had plenty of chances as a kid to hop on the bare back of a big horse, grab a handful of its mane, and hang on for dear life while it ran around the pasture. My children, on the other hand, were strictly suburb-dwellers. There was more concrete than bermuda grass in our neighborhood cul-de-sac.

All in all, the ride could not have been too exciting. Maybe the stature of the horse compared to the tiny size of my two young would-be jockeys provided them a little adrenaline. I know the actual race which we saw, crowded around Lee’s television set, was more fun for the adults than the children.

I’ve not been to another Derby Day watch-party since, but I’ve seen a few on television and as those beautiful horses round the corner for the finish at Churchill Downs, I always recall the pleasant afternoon on the quiet Kentucky-like estate of Mr and Mrs Lee Masters, with my children taking turns in their ‘Walk for the Roses.’

And they’re off!

Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a darn, cad-dash-it.

It was 75 years ago this month that those immortal words (or a similar phrase) were uttered by Rhett Butler in Margaret Mitchell’s lengthy antebellum romance, Gone with the Wind. Given that the book is set in the Deep South, her title is pretty close to the mark.

They are still working just to get started with the cleanup from the wind damage from the tornado-packing thunderstorms that raked the southern US. Tara, Scarlett O’Hara’s plantation home will have survived, along with Mitchell’s book title, which has become one of the post-twister phrases painted on rubble where homes used to be located.

For the 60th anniversary of the book’s release, publishers whipped up a fancy hardback edition as a commemorative item. Now, on the 75th year after the debut, stores can offer a paperback printed for the occasion – or that commemorative digital download with special gold-flecked text that glimmers in direct sunlight.

I’m kidding about that part.

It is obvious that the big sellers care more about the new electronic books than the standard, don’t-ever-need-a-battery type. With the exception of James Patterson, a suspense novelist who cranks out a new title every forty minutes, there are no television ads for published works. Even the Kindle and Nook don’t advertise titles, just devices.

Barnes and Noble never had a commercial before. Now, they’re talking about how the book lives on, or some other marketing phrase. Ironically, the ads will eventually contribute to the death of the book as we know it.

It’s a matter of time before the paper and ink items will become as curious and collectible as 45rpm vinyl records or as obscure as eight-track music tape cartridges (already most of you don’t recall those…).

I’m asked my opinion about whether the Kindle and the Nook will catch on, and – saluting Margaret Mitchell on the anniversary of her life’s work – I reply, “Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a…”

« Older posts Newer posts »